top of page

World Emoji Day: Can an Emoji Be a Legally Binding Signature?

  • Writer: Tommy Sangchompuphen
    Tommy Sangchompuphen
  • Jul 17
  • 2 min read

Today, July 17, marks World Emoji Day, a light-hearted celebration of the tiny digital symbols we use to communicate feelings, reactions, and ideas.


But emojis aren’t just for fun. They’ve found their way into courtrooms and legal disputes across the country. In fact, emojis can sometimes satisfy legal signature requirements. Let's break down what you need to know, especially if you’re preparing for the bar exam.

The Signature Requirement in Contracts


Under the Statute of Frauds, certain contracts must be in writing and “signed by the party to be charged.” Traditionally, a signature meant a handwritten name or mark. But with the rise of electronic communications, courts have expanded what counts as a “signature.”


A well-placed 👍 (thumbs-up) emoji in a text message has been found sufficient to form a contract under certain circumstances. For example:


A Canadian court recently ruled that a thumbs-up emoji constituted acceptance of a contract (see South West Terminal Ltd. v. Achter Land).


In U.S. jurisdictions, courts have considered emojis in interpreting intent, acceptance, and agreement terms (like Lightstone v. Zinntex, where a 👍 (thumbs-up) emoji raised fact‑issue concerns under the Statute of Frauds).


Bar Exam Takeaway


For bar exam purposes, remember:


✅ A signature doesn’t have to be a traditional name. Any mark or symbol can suffice if it shows intent to authenticate.


✅ Always analyze intent. Ask: Did the party intend the emoji to signify agreement or acceptance?


If you see a fact pattern involving text messages or informal communications, don’t dismiss them just because they seem casual. The formality of a signature isn’t required. Intent is key.


So, yes, on World Emoji Day, you can celebrate knowing that in certain legal contexts, a simple 👍 (thumbs-up) emoji might just seal the deal.

lastest posts

categories

archives

© 2025 by Tommy Sangchompuphen. 

The content on this blog reflects my personal views and experiences and do not represent the views or opinions of any other individual, organization, or institution. It is provided for informational purposes only and is not intended to constitute legal advice or create an attorney-client relationship. Readers should not act or refrain from acting based on any information contained in this blog without seeking appropriate legal or other professional advice on the particular facts and circumstances at issue.

bottom of page